首页> 外文OA文献 >Feed efficiency in beef cattle: relationship with digestibility, antioxidant activity, oxidative stress, growth performance, and carcass characteristics
【2h】

Feed efficiency in beef cattle: relationship with digestibility, antioxidant activity, oxidative stress, growth performance, and carcass characteristics

机译:肉牛的饲料效率:与消化率,抗氧化活性,氧化应激,生长性能和car体特性的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As production costs increase across the livestock industry, improving feed efficiency (FE) is one of the most crucial tasks for the beef industry to improve economic competitiveness relative to other meat-producing species. Substantial variation in FE may exist between individuals, yet the physiological mechanisms behind this variability are not well characterized. Furthermore, the industry would benefit from a more thorough understanding of the relationships between FE and other traits as well as an evaluation of the repeatability of FE across differing production phases and diet types. Consequently, this research sought to: 1) determine the influence of growing phase FE classification and diet type on performance of steers fed differing finishing phase diets, 2) determine effects of growing phase FE and diet, as well as finishing phase diet on diet digestibility and finishing phase FE, and 3) evaluate the relationship between FE, antioxidant activity and oxidative stress in feedlot steers representing phenotypic extremes for FE. It was hypothesized that relative FE was repeatable across feeding phases and that diet digestibility, antioxidant activity, and oxidative stress may be contributing factors to variation in FE between individuals. Completing the first objective, it was determined that steers classified as highly feed efficient (HFE) in the growing phase maintained greater finishing phase G:F and the relationship was also consistent for mid (MFE) and lowly feed efficient (LFE) growing phase FE classifications. Finishing phase G:F was not directly affected by growing or finishing phase diets but differences in finishing phase performance suggested that differences in finishing phase G:F between FE classifications were driven by differences in ADG among roughage-grown steers, versus differences in DMI that drove G:F variation among corn-grown steers. Additionally, the roughage growing diet and byproduct finishing diet combination appeared to be most advantageous, as those steers excelled in ADG, generating heavier carcasses with no decrease in G:F or marbling score. After completion of the second objective, it was determined that there were no differences in DM digestibility due to FE classification but fiber digestibility appeared to contribute to FE variation while starch digestibility did not. There was a positive correlation between growing and finishing phase diet DM digestibilities in steers fed similar diet types during both feeding phases, suggesting digestibility measured during one feeding phase may be indicative of digestive capacity during a subsequent phase if the diets are nutritionally similar. At the individual steer level, finishing phase G:F was greater in HFE versus LFE steers, though a negative correlation for G:F was detected between feeding phases when steers were roughage-grown and corn-finished. Finally, completion of the third objective revealed that antioxidant activity may play a role in FE as LFE steers, specifically roughage-grown LFE steers, had greater antioxidant activity than HFE steers, conceivably using a greater proportion of energy otherwise available for tissue accretion. Oxidative stress differences were predominately identified among the roughage-grown steers and in that group, HFE steers appeared to have a greater tolerance for oxidative stress than LFE steers as HFE steers had greater oxidative stress markers. Across the studies, G:F was repeatable from the growing phase to the finishing phase, thus growing phase FE appears to be a reasonable predictor of finishing phase FE. Variation in growth traits, diet digestibility, antioxidant activity, and oxidative stress markers were consistently detected between FE classifications, particularly between FE classifications within the roughage-grown groups.
机译:随着整个畜牧业生产成本的增加,提高饲料效率(FE)是牛肉行业相对于其他肉类生产企业提高经济竞争力的最关键任务之一。个体之间可能存在FE的大量变化,但这种变化背后的生理机制尚未得到很好的表征。此外,该行业将受益于对FE和其他性状之间关系的更透彻理解,以及对FE在不同生产阶段和饮食类型之间可重复性的评估。因此,本研究试图:1)确定生长期FE分类和饮食类型对不同育肥阶段饲喂的公牛性能的影响; 2)确定生长期FE和饮食以及育肥阶段饮食对饲料消化率的影响以及肥育阶段的肥育期,以及3)评估肥育场肥牛的肥力,抗氧化活性和氧化应激之间的关系,肥育场肥牛代表富肥的表型极端。据推测,相对FE在整个饲喂阶段是可重复的,饮食的消化率,抗氧化剂活性和氧化应激可能是个体之间FE发生变化的因素。为实现第一个目标,已确定在生长期被归类为高饲料效率(HFE)的ers牛皮保持较高的育肥阶段G:F,并且对于中期(MFE)和低饲料效率(LFE)的生长期FE,这种关系也一致分类。育肥阶段G:F不受生长或育肥阶段饮食的直接影响,但是育肥阶段性能的差异表明,FE分类之间的育肥阶段G:F的差异是由粗饲料公牛的ADG差异驱动的,而DMI则是导致玉米生长的公牛中G:F的差异。此外,粗饲料和副产品精制日粮的组合似乎是最有利的,因为那些ste牛在ADG中表现出色,产生的car体较重,而G:F或大理石花纹的评分均未降低。在完成第二个目标后,确定由于FE分类而导致的DM消化率没有差异,但是纤维消化率似乎有助于FE的变化,而淀粉消化率却没有。在两个饲喂阶段中饲喂相似日粮类型的ste牛,在生长阶段和末期日粮中的DM消化率之间存在正相关关系,这表明如果日粮的营养成分相似,则在一个饲喂阶段中测得的消化率可能表明下一阶段的消化能力。在个体ste牛皮水平上,HFE和LFE ers牛皮的完成阶段G:F更大,尽管当粗ers成长和玉米完成的ers牛皮的饲喂阶段之间发现G:F呈负相关。最后,第三个目标的完成表明,抗氧化活性可能在FE中发挥作用,因为LFE转向肉,特别是粗饲料生长的LFE转向肉,比HFE转向肉具有更高的抗氧化活性,可以想象会使用更大比例的能量来获取组织。在粗饲料生长的ers牛皮中主要鉴定出氧化应激差异,并且在该组中,HFE ers牛皮似乎具有比LFE ers牛皮更大的氧化应激耐受性,因为HFE ers牛皮具有更大的氧化应激标记。在整个研究中,G:F从生长期到完成阶段是可重复的,因此生长期FE似乎是完成阶段FE的合理预测指标。在FE分类之间,尤其是粗饲料生长群体中的FE分类之间,始终可以检测到生长性状,饮食消化率,抗氧化活性和氧化应激标记的变化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Russell, Jason Ryan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号